Calculators


The impact of leverage ratio can also be observed from the implied volatility surfaces of leveraged ETF options. Neither LSEG nor its licensors accept any liability arising out of the use of, reliance on or any errors or omissions in the XTF information. Bollinger Brands Lower Bollinger 10 Day:

Customize your NASDAQ.com experience


ETFs may be attractive as investments because of their low costs, tax efficiency , and stock-like features. ETF distributors only buy or sell ETFs directly from or to authorized participants , which are large broker-dealers with whom they have entered into agreements—and then, only in creation units , which are large blocks of tens of thousands of ETF shares, usually exchanged in-kind with baskets of the underlying securities.

Authorized participants may wish to invest in the ETF shares for the long-term, but they usually act as market makers on the open market, using their ability to exchange creation units with their underlying securities to provide liquidity of the ETF shares and help ensure that their intraday market price approximates the net asset value of the underlying assets. An ETF combines the valuation feature of a mutual fund or unit investment trust , which can be bought or sold at the end of each trading day for its net asset value, with the tradability feature of a closed-end fund , which trades throughout the trading day at prices that may be more or less than its net asset value.

Closed-end funds are not considered to be ETFs, even though they are funds and are traded on an exchange. ETFs traditionally have been index funds , but in the U. ETFs offer both tax efficiency as well as lower transaction and management costs. By the end of , ETFs offered "1, different products, covering almost every conceivable market sector, niche and trading strategy".

An ETF is a type of fund. It owns assets bonds, stocks, gold bars, etc. The details of the structure such as a corporation or trust will vary by country, and even within one country there may be multiple possible structures.

Shareholders are entitled to a share of the profits, such as interest or dividends, and they may get a residual value in case the fund is liquidated. Their ownership interest in the fund can easily be bought and sold. ETFs are similar in many ways to traditional mutual funds, except that shares in an ETF can be bought and sold throughout the day like stocks on a stock exchange through a broker-dealer.

Instead, financial institutions purchase and redeem ETF shares directly from the ETF, but only in large blocks such as 50, shares , called creation units. Purchases and redemptions of the creation units generally are in kind , with the institutional investor contributing or receiving a basket of securities of the same type and proportion held by the ETF, although some ETFs may require or permit a purchasing or redeeming shareholder to substitute cash for some or all of the securities in the basket of assets.

The ability to purchase and redeem creation units gives ETFs an arbitrage mechanism intended to minimize the potential deviation between the market price and the net asset value of ETF shares. Existing ETFs have transparent portfolios , so institutional investors will know exactly what portfolio assets they must assemble if they wish to purchase a creation unit, and the exchange disseminates the updated net asset value of the shares throughout the trading day, typically at second intervals.

If there is strong investor demand for an ETF, its share price will temporarily rise above its net asset value per share, giving arbitrageurs an incentive to purchase additional creation units from the ETF and sell the component ETF shares in the open market. The additional supply of ETF shares reduces the market price per share, generally eliminating the premium over net asset value.

A similar process applies when there is weak demand for an ETF: In the United States, most ETFs are structured as open-end management investment companies the same structure used by mutual funds and money market funds , although a few ETFs, including some of the largest ones, are structured as unit investment trusts. ETFs structured as open-end funds have greater flexibility in constructing a portfolio and are not prohibited from participating in securities lending programs or from using futures and options in achieving their investment objectives.

Some ETFs invest primarily in commodities or commodity-based instruments, such as crude oil and precious metals. Investors in a grantor trust have a direct interest in the underlying basket of securities, which does not change except to reflect corporate actions such as stock splits and mergers. Funds of this type are not investment companies under the Investment Company Act of As of , there were approximately 1, exchange-traded funds traded on US exchanges.

This product, however, was short-lived after a lawsuit by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange was successful in stopping sales in the United States. SPY , which were introduced in January WEBS were particularly innovative because they gave casual investors easy access to foreign markets. In , Barclays Global Investors put a significant effort behind the ETF marketplace, with a strong emphasis on education and distribution to reach long-term investors.

The iShares line was launched in early Barclays Global Investors was sold to BlackRock in The Vanguard Group entered the market in Some of Vanguard's ETFs are a share class of an existing mutual fund. They also created a TIPS fund. In , they introduced funds based on junk and muni bonds; about the same time SPDR and Vanguard got in gear and created several of their bond funds. Since then ETFs have proliferated, tailored to an increasingly specific array of regions, sectors, commodities, bonds, futures, and other asset classes.

ETFs generally provide the easy diversification , low expense ratios , and tax efficiency of index funds , while still maintaining all the features of ordinary stock, such as limit orders , short selling , and options.

Because ETFs can be economically acquired, held, and disposed of, some investors invest in ETF shares as a long-term investment for asset allocation purposes, while other investors trade ETF shares frequently to implement market timing investment strategies. Most ETFs are index funds that attempt to replicate the performance of a specific index. Indexes may be based on stocks, bonds , commodities, or currencies. An index fund seeks to track the performance of an index by holding in its portfolio either the contents of the index or a representative sample of the securities in the index.

There are various ways the ETF can be weighted, such as equal weighting or revenue weighting. The first and most popular ETFs track stocks. Stock ETFs can have different styles, such as large-cap , small-cap, growth, value, et cetera.

Others such as iShares Russell are mainly for small-cap stocks. ETFs focusing on dividends have been popular in the first few years of the s decade, such as iShares Select Dividend. ETFs can also be sector funds. These can be broad sectors, like finance and technology, or specific niche areas, like green power.

They can also be for one country or global. Critics have said that no one needs a sector fund. The funds are popular since people can put their money into the latest fashionable trend, rather than investing in boring areas with no "cachet". Exchange-traded funds that invest in bonds are known as bond ETFs.

Because of this cause and effect relationship, the performance of bond ETFs may be indicative of broader economic conditions. Among the first commodity ETFs were gold exchange-traded funds , which have been offered in a number of countries. However, generally commodity ETFs are index funds tracking non-security indices. They may, however, be subject to regulation by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. SLV , owned the physical commodity e. However, most ETCs implement a futures trading strategy, which may produce quite different results from owning the commodity.

Commodity ETFs trade just like shares, are simple and efficient and provide exposure to an ever-increasing range of commodities and commodity indices, including energy, metals, softs and agriculture. However, it is important for an investor to realize that there are often other factors that affect the price of a commodity ETF that might not be immediately apparent.

For example, buyers of an oil ETF such as USO might think that as long as oil goes up, they will profit roughly linearly. What isn't clear to the novice investor is the method by which these funds gain exposure to their underlying commodities. In the case of many commodity funds, they simply roll so-called front-month futures contracts from month to month. This does give exposure to the commodity, but subjects the investor to risks involved in different prices along the term structure , such as a high cost to roll.

ETC can also refer to exchange-traded notes , which are not exchange-traded funds. FXE in New York. Since then Rydex has launched a series of funds tracking all major currencies under their brand CurrencyShares. The funds are total return products where the investor gets access to the FX spot change, local institutional interest rates and a collateral yield. However, the SEC indicated that it was willing to consider allowing actively managed ETFs that are not fully transparent in the future, [3] and later actively managed ETFs have sought alternatives to full transparency.

The fully transparent nature of existing ETFs means that an actively managed ETF is at risk from arbitrage activities by market participants who might choose to front run its trades as daily reports of the ETF's holdings reveals its manager's trading strategy. The initial actively managed equity ETFs addressed this problem by trading only weekly or monthly.

Actively managed debt ETFs, which are less susceptible to front-running, trade their holdings more frequently. The actively managed ETF market has largely been seen as more favorable to bond funds, because concerns about disclosing bond holdings are less pronounced, there are fewer product choices, and there is increased appetite for bond products.

Actively managed ETFs grew faster in their first three years of existence than index ETFs did in their first three years of existence. As track records develop, many see actively managed ETFs as a significant competitive threat to actively managed mutual funds. Jack Bogle of Vanguard Group wrote an article in the Financial Analysts Journal where he estimated that higher fees as well as hidden costs such a more trading fees and lower return from holding cash reduce returns for investors by around 2.

An exchange-traded grantor trust was used to give a direct interest in a static basket of stocks selected from a particular industry. Such products have some properties in common with ETFs—low costs, low turnover, and tax efficiency: Inverse ETFs are constructed by using various derivatives for the purpose of profiting from a decline in the value of the underlying benchmark.

It is a similar type of investment to holding several short positions or using a combination of advanced investment strategies to profit from falling prices. Many inverse ETFs use daily futures as their underlying benchmark. A leveraged inverse bear ETF fund on the other hand may attempt to achieve returns that are -2x or -3x the daily index return, meaning that it will gain double or triple the loss of the market.

Leveraged ETFs require the use of financial engineering techniques, including the use of equity swaps , derivatives and rebalancing , and re-indexing to achieve the desired return. The rebalancing and re-indexing of leveraged ETFs may have considerable costs when markets are volatile.

Investors may however circumvent this problem by buying or writing futures directly, accepting a varying leverage ratio. The re-indexing problem of leveraged ETFs stems from the arithmetic effect of volatility of the underlying index. The index then drops back to a drop of 9.

The drop in the 2X fund will be This puts the value of the 2X fund at Even though the index is unchanged after two trading periods, an investor in the 2X fund would have lost 1. This decline in value can be even greater for inverse funds leveraged funds with negative multipliers such as -1, -2, or It always occurs when the change in value of the underlying index changes direction. And the decay in value increases with volatility of the underlying index. The effect of leverage is also reflected in the pricing of options written on leveraged ETFs.

The impact of leverage ratio can also be observed from the implied volatility surfaces of leveraged ETF options. The decision concerns two potential products: ETFs have a reputation for lower costs than traditional mutual funds. This will be evident as a lower expense ratio. However, this needs to be compared in each case, since some index mutual funds also have a very low expense ratio, and some ETFs' expense ratios are relatively high.

An index fund is much simpler to run, since it does not require some security selection, and can be largely done by computer. Not only does an ETF have lower shareholder-related expenses, but because it does not have to invest cash contributions or fund cash redemptions, an ETF does not have to maintain a cash reserve for redemptions and saves on brokerage expenses. Over the long term, these cost differences can compound into a noticeable difference. Because ETFs trade on an exchange, each transaction is generally subject to a brokerage commission.

Commissions depend on the brokerage and which plan is chosen by the customer. Generally, mutual funds obtained directly from the fund company itself do not charge a brokerage fee.

Thus, when low or no-cost transactions are available, ETFs become very competitive. The cost difference is more evident when compared with mutual funds that charge a front-end or back-end load as ETFs do not have loads at all.

The redemption fee and short-term trading fees are examples of other fees associated with mutual funds that do not exist with ETFs. Traders should be cautious if they plan to trade inverse and leveraged ETFs for short periods of time. Close attention should be paid to transaction costs and daily performance rates as the potential combined compound loss can sometimes go unrecognized and offset potential gains over a longer period of time.

Due to their low volatility, consumer staples stocks are considered to play a key role in defensive strategies. Buoyed by the persistent demand of it products, consumer staples companies generate consistent revenues, even in recessionary periods. As a result, consumer staples stocks decline far less during bear markets than stocks in other sectors. The consumer staples sector also often lures investors with its components' rich dividend yields , which tend to be larger than in other sectors.

Because of their slow and steady nature, consumer staples stocks can also not only continue to pay dividends through recessionary periods, but often continue to increase their payouts. Further, consumer staples are important for diversification. Because these stocks tend to have opposite performance with consumer d iscretionary stocks in market recessions , they can help being balance to a portfolio.

Consumer discretionary is an economic sector that comprises items Technical buy signs on the charts of companies from across the consumer staples sector suggest that now is the ideal time to buy. Learn about the consumer staples sector, including performance in , and the top three high-yield dividend consumer staples mutual funds to consider. As the markets have swooned, so have many boring sectors. That includes consumer staples stocks. Still, the sector could still be a value based on historical data.

Investors may not want to abandon Learn why understanding the seasonal tendencies of consumer discretionary and consumer staple sectors will help improve investors' portfolio performance. Thinking about investing for dividend yield? Here is a consumer staples stock list of companies that could potentially sell off. ODP to right its ship.

By June, of course, the deal was dead -- sunk by antitrust concerns. Components of the XLP are projected to yield an average earnings growth rate of 8. SPLS has struggled to find a new plan forward. An earnings deluge is coming from the tobacco industry and that could move consumer staples ETFs.